iMoogle - An FFXI/FFXIV LS (2003 - 2014)

Ok, after taking all this in after going to Happyhumans with a raid schedule that I tried to make for Monarchy after seeing Fatesealers line up, to have it turn into a confrontation almost, I have come up with what I would like to see as a resolution and Urge each respective member that represents their LS to do the same, and then we can compromise from there.

Happyhumans have stated that they only wish to take on each ice zone one time each month. So I?m taking that into being the backbone for my resolution since they are saying they actually want to go less than the other LS. But do not seem to want to budge from Dyn-Glacier to let the other two LS try their hand at doing Dyn-Glacier back-to-back trips, since they planned on doing Dyn-Glacier on this Friday.

Now what Fatesealers proposed was:
[F] 8/05: Dynamis - Beaucedine
[F] 8/12: Dynamis - Beaucedine
[F] 8/19: Dynamis - Xarcabard
[F] 8/26: Dynamis - Xarcabard

But that is really heavily dependant on you clearing that zone in that 2-week span to get your raid through to Dyn-Xarc. I think we need to take one step at a time. Because it is impossible to make a fair long-term plan if you do not know you can get your whole raid through in time with key item.

Now what Happyhumans proposed was:
[F] 8/05: Dynamis - Beaucedine
[F] 8/13: Dynamis - Jeuno
[F] 8/20: Dynamis - Windurst
[F] 8/27: Dynamis - Xarcabard

Now if you compromise those two schedules, and not factor in Null yet, you could easily come up with:

Fatesealers
[F] 8/05: Dynamis - Windurst
[F] 8/12: Dynamis - Beaucedine
[F] 8/19: Dynamis - Beaucedine
[F] 8/26: Dynamis - Xarcabard (if you get you key item)
[F] 9/02: Dynamis - Xarcabard (if you get your key item)

Happyhumans
[F] 8/05: Dynamis - Beaucedine
[F] 8/12: Dynamis - Jeuno
[F] 8/19: Dynamis - Xarcabard
[F] 8/26: Dynamis - Windurst
[F] 9/02: Dynamis - Random City

Which would leave Null with:
[F] 8/05: Dynamis - Jeuno
[F] 8/12: Dynamis - Bastok
[F] 8/19: Dynamis - Windurst
[F] 8/26: Dynamis - Beaucedine
[F] 9/02: Dynamis - Beaucedine

Then from that point depending on avalibility of Null and Fatesealers to Xarcabard, then we could work out a 1 time every 3 weeks for each of the ice zones for each of the linkshells.

This is just my suggestion, and as you can see, I everyone gives and takes just a little and all could be happy with what they want. And Fatesealers would have to understand that with everyone giving a bit, they might have to take city runs on their Xarcabard days if they are not ready to enter into it with their full raid. I urge Chanalix and Pockie to please come up with their own also where everyone is giving in a little to accommodate each other?s plans. I am trying to be as objective as I was to begin with on this; I just want to see all linkshells get what they desire out of their Dynamis experience, without going to far out of their way.

This plan seems to be fair in my eyes, but then again I thought that last one was fair, but wasn?t. This is just a new spin on it that would keep all parties included happy with what they saw as their plan for their raid.

Thanks

Ero

I will work with this until 9/2. By then 3 leaders should take turns on who gets first pick for a zone for the following week...

we can /random for the initial 1st, 2nd, 3rd

(ie)
HH>TM>FS>HH>TM>FS... etc

That sounds like a plan. Make this compromise work for 5 weeks (which is quite a long itme really) and by then we can work something out with a new rotation. Thanks for working together on this guys, I posted the same message on FS board and chanalix seemed receptive to it too.

yea sounds cool

if for the consecative weeks we not doing iceland and FS and Null agree to do BCD and Xarca consecatively like as of above its fine with me

just dont leave HH out of a zone is fine